|
2008 US executive compensation
preview
A big factor shaping this year’s
proxy season is the slowing US economy. Economic stagnation provides the
ultimate “stress test” for many corporate decisions, including executive
compensation programs. And talk about stress; consider these perspectives:
|
- Shareholders,
who are experiencing deteriorating returns, are becoming more activist than
ever and want to see compensation outcomes linked to sustained financial and
share price results.
- Companies
see an unpredictable economic future and are struggling with how to establish
short-term incentive goals, let alone ones that are credible over a two- to
five-year period.
- Boards of
directors, who believe that there is always a market for top talent, are
anxious to retain their own talent to provide the leadership, vision and
execution needed to meet the challenges of a volatile business cycle.
Adding to these
stresses, companies are trying to comply with SEC guidance clarifying the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) disclosure requirements and
responding to shareholder proposals on a variety of topics.
|
|
Free web briefing
Enroll now!
|
|
2008 Executive
Compensation:
Current state, future direction
We will sift through
all the newly available CEO compensation data for insight on future
executive pay trends.
Date: Thursday, May 15,
2008
Time: 12 noon - 1 PM ET
Cost: Free
Speakers: Diane
Doubleday, Mike Halloran and Peter Oppermann
Questions: See details below or e-mail: webbriefings@mercer.com
|
|
With this backdrop
in mind, noteworthy trends that we think are likely to reshape how executive
compensation programs are designed and pay decisions are made in 2008 and the
years ahead include the following:
- Pay for performance gets the spotlight. Issues
shaping this proxy season are converging in one important arena: pay for
performance. Shareholders want it; the SEC is asking companies to disclose
specific measures and targets; and companies are looking closely at how
performance could be affected by an unpredictable economic environment. We
expect to see “disconnects” – where awards based on 2007 performance are
reported in 2008, a time of depressed share prices and perhaps poor Q1
earnings and revenue reports. Companies will have a difficult time getting
their pay-for-performance story heard.
- Goal setting and performance measures revisited in an economic
downturn. Uneasy with the market’s volatility,
companies are taking a hard look at the drivers of long-term economic value,
reassessing performance metrics and realigning variable compensation with
financial, strategic and operational measures instead of more traditional
metrics such as “earnings.” But with so much uncertainty created by the
financial market crisis, companies are struggling to set credible goals.
While some companies can use a relative approach (tied to the performance of
an external index or industry group), they need to be prepared to pay – and
possibly pay well – for negative absolute performance.
- Continued changes in long-term incentive strategy.
Surprisingly, the pace of change in the long-term incentive arena doesn’t
seem to have slowed. The experimentation with a mix of equity vehicles
continues as companies add vehicles or change the allocation among options,
restricted stock, performance-based equity and even cash. Some companies have
looked at an uncertain economic future and made the decision to adjust, reduce or
even eliminate performance-based equity until the economy stabilizes.
- Re-emergence of stock option repricing. Stock
price changes put stress on equity compensation programs, particularly those
relying on options. Some companies are examining whether there is a
compelling rationale for repricing stock options for all holders, not just
executives. The new twist on this old strategy is that now it requires
shareholder approval. Whether shareholders will acquiesce when returns are
down remains to be seen.
- Market fragmentation: A shift from ‘typical’ practice. As
companies focus on implementing compensation programs tailored to their
individual strategies, culture and priorities, we no longer see a “typical”
compensation structure employed by the majority of companies – even within an
industry group. Even the tech sector, where options were once the only equity
vehicle used, now displays a wide array of approaches, using cash and a variety
of equity vehicles. Larger companies were the first to break from this norm,
but smaller and mid-size companies are quickly following suit.
- Shareholder optics has an impact. In light of
increased disclosure requirements for greater transparency and specificity,
companies are re-examining total executive rewards. The result: Compensation
targeted to the 50th rather than the 75th percentile; more rigor in
establishing peer groups for comparing market practices; increased use of
clawback, anti-hedging and other policies to protect shareholders; and
decreased use of perquisites and benefits. Further, higher rates of executive
turnover have afforded boards an unexpected opportunity to revisit and
reshape the terms of employment, including change of control and severance
arrangements.
The 2008 proxy season is shaping up to be
memorable. Companies are going to great lengths to adjust to the changing
economic, governance and regulatory environments. Many are making major
adjustments to their business model and realigning compensation accordingly.
Our experience is that the CD&A has for many companies required a deep
dive into the rationale for programs and intense debate over performance
measures and goals. As a result, they are taking a harder look at aligning to
their business strategy and compensation philosophy and adjusting grant
levels, performance metrics and incentive vehicles in order to attract,
retain and motivate executives, while still being responsive to their
shareholders’ expectations.
|
|
Interested in learning more? Attend our web briefing on
May 15, 2008
2008
Executive Compensation: The current state and future direction
Our executive compensation
experts will sift through all the newly available CEO compensation data for
insight on future executive pay trends. They will discuss the
issues weighing on the minds of board members and companies today, including:
- Executive
pay levels. Get
Mercer’s read on CEO pay packages from our survey of Jumbo 50, Large 150 and
Mid-size 150 companies. How do they compare and contrast? What do the total
compensation figures signal?
- Rebalancing
the LTI mix. The
pace of change in the long-term incentive (LTI) arena surprisingly hasn’t
slowed, and the experimentation with a mix of equity vehicles continues. What
does the CEO LTI mix look like now?
- Advances
in pay for performance. Companies have long touted a pay-for-performance philosophy. Are
top performing companies rewarded with larger salary increases than poor
performers? How will an unpredictable economic environment affect that?
- Perquisites
and benefits. In
this new disclosure area, what do the filings reveal about changing
practices? Is the value of perquisites received declining?
- The
influence of shareholders. How are institutional and individual investors affecting CEO
compensation decisions?
Register today! Go to www.mercer.com/webbriefings
to register for this informative event. There is no fee to attend.
|
We present our web
briefings for our clients, potential clients and other interested parties,
but we reserve the right to exclude employees of competitor firms. Please
register for this event using your corporate e-mail address.
|
|

|